Garmin Forerunner 170 vs Withings ScanWatch 2
Sqwod verdict
Our pick: Garmin Forerunner 170 takes it — 85 vs 81.
Both are strong — the call comes down to what you prioritise:
- Garmin Forerunner 170 — You coach runners or endurance clients and want Garmin's readiness and load metrics on a first 'real' training watch, without the €500 tier.
- Withings ScanWatch 2 — You have health-focused clients who want discreet, long-battery cardiovascular and sleep monitoring in a classic-looking watch.
Our pick 
Garmin Forerunner 170
85Score · Medium
from €250.56
A software-led upgrade on the 165: Training Readiness, Training Status, running power and dynamics and Garmin Pay arrive at the entry price, on the same AMOLED and sensor. Street prices have settled near where the 165 was, but battery is a touch shorter and GPS is still single-band.
Withings ScanWatch 2
81Score · Medium
from €275.13
The best-looking hybrid for serious health tracking — medical-grade heart insights and ~30-day battery, if you can live without GPS or smart apps.
Compare side-by-side
| Garmin Forerunner 17085Scorefrom€250.56Review → | Withings ScanWatch 281Scorefrom€275.13Review → | |
|---|---|---|
| Form factor | — | — |
| Battery life | — | — |
| Screen | — | — |
| Sleep tracking | — | — |
| Recovery / HRV | — | — |
| Subscription | — | — |
| Water resistance | — | — |
Prices are our researched reference points.
Affiliate disclosure. We may earn a commission from links on this page. It never affects the Sqwod Score — scores are set by the methodology, not commission.