Fitbit Charge 6 vs Suunto Race
Our pick: Suunto Race takes it — 87 vs 82.
Both are strong — the call comes down to what you prioritise:
- Fitbit Charge 6 — You want an affordable, accurate everyday tracker for yourself or clients.
- Suunto Race — Buy it if you want a big, bright AMOLED multisport watch with strong dual-band GPS, maps and multi-day battery for far less than a Garmin Forerunner 965.
Fitbit Charge 6
The best-value everyday tracker — accurate sensors, ECG and Google smarts for under €100. Just know the best insights sit behind Fitbit Premium.
Suunto Race
The Suunto Race is the best watch Suunto has made in years: a bright 1.43-inch AMOLED, accurate dual-band GPS and genuinely huge battery life, all launched well below Garmin. Now selling around 320 EUR (down from a 449 EUR RRP), it is one of the best-value AMOLED multisport watches you can buy. The catch is software: the Suunto app and on-watch OS feel slower and thinner than Garmin Connect, the wrist heart-rate sensor is only so-so, and recovery/sleep metrics are noisy. For runners and outdoor athletes who want a big screen, maps and long battery without paying Garmin money, it is an easy recommendation.
Compare side-by-side
| Fitbit Charge 682Scorefrom€89Review → | Suunto Race87Scorefrom€319.16Review → | |
|---|---|---|
| Form factor | Band | — |
| Battery life | ~7 days | — |
| Screen | AMOLED | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Recovery / HRV | Daily Readiness (Premium) | — |
| Subscription | Optional (Premium) | — |
| Water resistance | 50 m | — |
Prices are our researched reference points.
Affiliate disclosure. We may earn a commission from links on this page. It never affects the Sqwod Score — scores are set by the methodology, not commission.