Fitbit Charge 6 vs Garmin Forerunner 165
Sqwod verdict
Our pick: Garmin Forerunner 165 takes it — 86 vs 82.
Both are strong — the call comes down to what you prioritise:
- Fitbit Charge 6 — You want an affordable, accurate everyday tracker for yourself or clients.
- Garmin Forerunner 165 — You coach runners or endurance clients and want Garmin's training data without the €500 tier.
Fitbit Charge 6
82Score · High
from €89
The best-value everyday tracker — accurate sensors, ECG and Google smarts for under €100. Just know the best insights sit behind Fitbit Premium.
Our pick 
Garmin Forerunner 165
86Score · High
from €175
The best-value entry into Garmin's training ecosystem — bright AMOLED, ~11-day battery, and the metrics that matter, without the €500 price.
Compare side-by-side
| Fitbit Charge 682Scorefrom€89Review → | Garmin Forerunner 16586Scorefrom€175Review → | |
|---|---|---|
| Form factor | Band | Watch (running) |
| Battery life | ~7 days | ~11 days |
| Screen | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Recovery / HRV | Daily Readiness (Premium) | Body Battery |
| Subscription | Optional (Premium) | None |
| Water resistance | 50 m | 50 m (5 ATM) |
Prices are our researched reference points.
Affiliate disclosure. We may earn a commission from links on this page. It never affects the Sqwod Score — scores are set by the methodology, not commission.