Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Oura Ring Gen3
Sqwod verdict
Our pick: Oura Ring Gen3 takes it — 89 vs 84.
Both are strong — the call comes down to what you prioritise:
- Garmin Forerunner 165 — You coach runners or endurance clients and want Garmin's training data without the €500 tier.
- Oura Ring Gen3 — You're a coach who programs around recovery and sleep, or you want the calmest readiness data to guide client load.
Garmin Forerunner 165
84Score · High
from €249
The best-value entry into Garmin's training ecosystem — bright AMOLED, ~11-day battery, and the metrics that matter, without the €500 price.
Our pick
Oura Ring Gen3
89Score · High
from €299
The most coach-trusted sleep and readiness tracker — discreet, accurate where it counts, and the recovery benchmark. The subscription is the catch.
Compare side-by-side
| Garmin Forerunner 16584Scorefrom€249Review → | Oura Ring Gen389Scorefrom€299Review → | |
|---|---|---|
| Form factor | Watch (running) | Ring |
| Battery life | ~11 days | ~7 days |
| Screen | AMOLED | None |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Best-in-class |
| Recovery / HRV | Body Battery | Readiness score |
| Subscription | None | Required (~€6/mo) |
| Water resistance | 50 m (5 ATM) | 100 m |
Prices are our reviewed reference points.
Affiliate disclosure. We may earn a commission from links on this page. It never affects the Sqwod Score — scores are set by the methodology, not commission.